Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 27 Jun 2013 11:42:26 +0200 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC nohz_full 0/8] Provide infrastructure for full-system idle |
| |
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 03:24:42PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > Just to make sure I understand... You are saying that it is OK for > NO_HZ_FULL to shut down timekeeping if all CPUs are idle, even if some > of them are taking NMIs from time to time, right?
Yeah.. its what we currently do and I don't see any reason to have NO_HZ_FULL behave differently there.
| |