Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 25 Jun 2013 12:51:35 +0200 | From | Robert Richter <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 03/14] perf: Add persistent event facilities |
| |
On 25.06.13 11:37:06, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:24:39AM +0200, Robert Richter wrote: > > I also see 'pers_' not as an optimum since it could be mixed-up easily > > with 'perf_'. Maybe we take 'persist_' instead? > > Yep, although it reads wrong: > > perf_add_persist_event
We could use persist_ as prefix for static functions and use the long versions for the interface only.
But all this is a bit bikeshedding. I am sure we find something.
-Robert
| |