Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 23 Jun 2013 14:43:18 +0200 | From | Wolfram Sang <> | Subject | Re: i2c: introduce i2c helper i2c_find_client_by_name() |
| |
> >I also wonder about the need to unregister. I have to admit I don't know > >much about I2C handling in v4l2. But if it requires unregistering from > >i2c core and registering to v4l2 core, then it sounds to me like we > >could check if there is a more fundamential cleanup needed? Deferring > >for now, looks like an issue worth looking at, yet there are other > >things in the queue first. > > > > Platform codes are supposed to call i2c_register_board_info() or > i2c_new_device() to register devices, we don't want to change this.
Exactly.
> Not sure v4l2 can still take over the devices without > unregistering/registering. Need look deeply into the v4l2 code...
That would help, I currently don't have time for that.
Thanks,
Wolfram [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
| |