lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jun]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: i2c: introduce i2c helper i2c_find_client_by_name()

> >I also wonder about the need to unregister. I have to admit I don't know
> >much about I2C handling in v4l2. But if it requires unregistering from
> >i2c core and registering to v4l2 core, then it sounds to me like we
> >could check if there is a more fundamential cleanup needed? Deferring
> >for now, looks like an issue worth looking at, yet there are other
> >things in the queue first.
> >
>
> Platform codes are supposed to call i2c_register_board_info() or
> i2c_new_device() to register devices, we don't want to change this.

Exactly.

> Not sure v4l2 can still take over the devices without
> unregistering/registering. Need look deeply into the v4l2 code...

That would help, I currently don't have time for that.

Thanks,

Wolfram
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-06-23 15:01    [W:0.067 / U:0.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site