Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:05:30 +0200 | From | Nicolas Ferre <> | Subject | Re: RE : [GIT PULL] at91: Device Tree update for 3.11 #2 |
| |
On 17/06/2013 18:56, Olof Johansson : > On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Ferre, Nicolas <Nicolas.FERRE@atmel.com> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:47:47AM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >>>> Arnd, Olof, >>>> >>>> Additional pull-request for AT91 DT patches. >>>> It contains the remaining part of the USB gadget pull-request that I sent you >>>> last week. After having split it, here is the DT part. >>>> It also contains the update of DMA bindings: it is the AT91 part the should go >>>> through arm-soc. I have included the patch (ARM: at91: dt: add header to define >>>> at_hdmac configuration) so that we avoid build errors whichever git tree >>>> (slave-dma or arm-soc) is merged first. >>>> A SPI DT patch for at91sam9x5 is also added. >>>> >>>> Thanks, best regards, >>>> >>>> The following changes since commit 028633c238f91dc113520a7ad25d37b2ba9068af: >>>> >>>> ARM: at91/dt: add pinctrl definition for at91 tc blocks (2013-05-31 22:40:37 +0200) >>>> >>>> are available in the git repository at: >>>> >>>> git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git tags/at91-dt >>> >>> Pulled, thanks. >> >> Hi, >> >> I do not see it appearing in arm-soc/at91/dt branch even though is it present in arm-soc/for-next: is it normal? > > I had missed to push that (and the driver branch) up. They are there > now, as at91/dt2 and at91/drivers. Fixed the bad branch name in > arm-soc-for-next-contents.txt as well.
Nice, thanks.
Bye, -- Nicolas Ferre
| |