Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 17 Jun 2013 09:56:20 -0700 | Subject | Re: RE : [GIT PULL] at91: Device Tree update for 3.11 #2 | From | Olof Johansson <> |
| |
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Ferre, Nicolas <Nicolas.FERRE@atmel.com> wrote: > >>On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:47:47AM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >>> Arnd, Olof, >>> >>> Additional pull-request for AT91 DT patches. >>> It contains the remaining part of the USB gadget pull-request that I sent you >>> last week. After having split it, here is the DT part. >>> It also contains the update of DMA bindings: it is the AT91 part the should go >>> through arm-soc. I have included the patch (ARM: at91: dt: add header to define >>> at_hdmac configuration) so that we avoid build errors whichever git tree >>> (slave-dma or arm-soc) is merged first. >>> A SPI DT patch for at91sam9x5 is also added. >>> >>> Thanks, best regards, >>> >>> The following changes since commit 028633c238f91dc113520a7ad25d37b2ba9068af: >>> >>> ARM: at91/dt: add pinctrl definition for at91 tc blocks (2013-05-31 22:40:37 +0200) >>> >>> are available in the git repository at: >>> >>> git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git tags/at91-dt >> >>Pulled, thanks. > > Hi, > > I do not see it appearing in arm-soc/at91/dt branch even though is it present in arm-soc/for-next: is it normal?
I had missed to push that (and the driver branch) up. They are there now, as at91/dt2 and at91/drivers. Fixed the bad branch name in arm-soc-for-next-contents.txt as well.
-Olof
| |