Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 17 Jun 2013 10:41:06 +0200 | From | Maxime Ripard <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/6] pinctrl: sunxi: Move the pins definitions to a separate header |
| |
Hi Linus,
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 01:03:09PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Maxime Ripard > <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote: > > > It will allow us to have a cleaner separation between the data needed by > > the driver to work, and the core logic of the driver in itself, and will > > allow having too much noise in the core driver in the future. > > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> > > Patch applied. > > Since you will anyway have to bring the ARM SoC branch on > top of the pinctrl tree, I might as well apply this to my tree.
Thanks for merging this.
I applied the other patches except for the 5th one that Emilio commented on.
> If everything else fails, you'll have a nice development base > in v3.11 with this in place, right?
Yes, As far as I can see, we should have a pretty complete support for the GPIO/muxing/IRQ on the "old" allwinner SoCs (sun4i and sun5i) now.
Maxime
-- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
| |