Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 9 May 2013 12:38:19 +0900 | From | Simon Horman <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 03/21] ARM: shmobile: don't call irqchip_init unconditionally |
| |
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 03:22:22PM +0200, Bastian Hecht wrote: > Hi, > > 2013/5/8 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>: > > On Thursday 02 May 2013, Simon Horman wrote: > >> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/intc-r8a7740.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/intc-r8a7740.c > >> > > index 8871f77..5dc57f1 100644 > >> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/intc-r8a7740.c > >> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/intc-r8a7740.c > >> > > @@ -53,14 +53,23 @@ static void __init r8a7740_init_irq_common(void) > >> > > > >> > > void __init r8a7740_init_irq_of(void) > >> > > { > >> > > + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)) > >> > > + return; > >> > > + > >> > > irqchip_init(); > >> > > >> > Why not have an empty irqchip_init? I'd guess we'll need this on other > >> > platforms and your default mach. > >> > >> Thanks, I think that could work. > >> > >> I will see about making it so. > > > > Ping > > I have sent out a patch adding an empty irqchip_init() when > CONFIG_IRQCHIP is not set with the subject > [PATCH] irqchip: Add irqchip_init dummy function
Thanks.
> > Linux-next is still broken for me. There is also anothe shmobile build bug, > > I'll send a separate patch for that, which also needs to go into your tree.
Sorry about that. I though I had pushed your fix (the first hunk of the patch that started this thread), but it seems that I did not.
> Oh thanks Arnd for this fix! > > Cheers, > > Bastian
| |