Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 8 May 2013 11:48:39 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] ARM: exynos: Select PINCTRL_EXYNOS for exynos5 | From | Doug Anderson <> |
| |
Olof,
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote: > Seems like this should be selected by the SoC (ARCH_EXYNOS5) instead > of the board. Actually, I'm not sure we need the board Kconfig entry > long-term; all boards will be dt-only.
Good point. Hopefully someone at Samsung can work on removing the board itself? If you'd like me to take this on then let me know and I can put it on my list.
I'm happy to resubmit my patch under ARCH_EXYNOS5. I'll move the exynos4 one at the same time.
I'm going to make the assumption that PINCTRL_EXYNOS and PINCTRL_EXYNOS5440 can happily coexist. Certainly I've got both defined in my tree right now and nothing blows up. I haven't tested on 5440 but things ought to be handled by "compatible" checks, right?
I'll also assume that eventually someone will move PINCTRL_EXYNOS5440 into PINCTRL_EXYNOS. If PINCTRL_EXYNOS5440 won't eventually move under PINCTRL_EXYNOS then it makes less sense to define PINCTRL_EXYNOS for all exynos parts.
-Doug
| |