Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 6 May 2013 10:11:52 -0300 | From | Ezequiel Garcia <> | Subject | Re: Splitting stk1160-ac97 as a module (Re: linux-next: Tree for May 1 (media/usb/stk1160)) |
| |
On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 09:59:50PM +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > Ezequiel, All, > > On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 02:21:44PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > > I'm trying to split the ac97 support into a separate module. > > So far I've managed to do this with two different approaches, > > but both of them are broken in some way :-( > > > > Couple questions: > > > > 1. Is it possible to force two symbols to be both built-in (=y) or both > > modules (=m)? This would make one of my solutions work. > > If they are always the same value, there is no need to have two symbols > in the first place. > > However, given the original problem from this thread, if what you meant > was to have the second symbol either 'n' or the same as the first symbol, > ie. the following table: > > A: n m m y y > B: n n m n y > > Then the closest I came up with is: > > config MODULES > bool "Modules" > > config A > tristate "A" > > config B_dummy > bool "B" > depends on A > > config B > tristate > default m if A=m && B_dummy > default y if A=y && B_dummy > > where B_dummy is not used outside of Kconfig, and only A and B are the > symbols of interest (eg. to build the drivers). >
That worked like a charm!
Thanks a lot, -- Ezequiel García, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |