lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [May]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] Comparison of power-efficient scheduling patch sets
On 05/31/2013 09:17 AM, Alex Shi wrote:
>> > Kernel: 3.9
>> >
>> > Patch sets:
>> > rlb-v4: sched: use runnable load based balance (Alex Shi)
>> > <https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/27/13>
> Thanks for the valuable comparison!
>
> The runnable load balance target is performance. It is still try to
> disperse tasks to as much as possible CPUs. :)
> The latest v7 version remove the 6th patch(wake_affine change) in v4.
> and plus fix a slept time double counting issue, and remove
> blocked_load_avg in tg load.
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1498988

Even the rlb patch set target is performance, Maybe the power benefit is
due to better balancing?

Anyway I appreciate if you like to test the latest v7 version. :)
https://github.com/alexshi/power-scheduling.git runnablelb

--
Thanks
Alex


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-05-31 11:01    [W:0.244 / U:0.484 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site