Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 31 May 2013 16:23:38 +0800 | From | Alex Shi <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] Comparison of power-efficient scheduling patch sets |
| |
On 05/31/2013 09:17 AM, Alex Shi wrote: >> > Kernel: 3.9 >> > >> > Patch sets: >> > rlb-v4: sched: use runnable load based balance (Alex Shi) >> > <https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/27/13> > Thanks for the valuable comparison! > > The runnable load balance target is performance. It is still try to > disperse tasks to as much as possible CPUs. :) > The latest v7 version remove the 6th patch(wake_affine change) in v4. > and plus fix a slept time double counting issue, and remove > blocked_load_avg in tg load. > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1498988
Even the rlb patch set target is performance, Maybe the power benefit is due to better balancing?
Anyway I appreciate if you like to test the latest v7 version. :) https://github.com/alexshi/power-scheduling.git runnablelb
-- Thanks Alex
| |