Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 27 May 2013 10:04:33 +0200 | Subject | Re: why do we need atomic_set_unchecked | From | richard -rw- weinberger <> |
| |
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 9:47 AM, johnspaul92 <johns@ti.com> wrote: > When i tried to apply the GrSecurity patch on linux kernel 3.10 and there the > patch actually modifies atomic_set to atomic_set_unchecked. When i checked > the gcc patch to compile this code it just redefines atomic_set as > atomic_set_unchecked. So what is the use of changing the function name.?? Am > I missing something here(i.e have they given a new definition for this > function anywhere else). And i would also like to know what this > function(atomic_set_unchecked. I know about the atomic_set function) is > used for.
Isn't this a question for the grsecurity developers?
-- Thanks, //richard
| |