lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [May]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: why do we need atomic_set_unchecked
From
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 9:47 AM, johnspaul92 <johns@ti.com> wrote:
> When i tried to apply the GrSecurity patch on linux kernel 3.10 and there the
> patch actually modifies atomic_set to atomic_set_unchecked. When i checked
> the gcc patch to compile this code it just redefines atomic_set as
> atomic_set_unchecked. So what is the use of changing the function name.?? Am
> I missing something here(i.e have they given a new definition for this
> function anywhere else). And i would also like to know what this
> function(atomic_set_unchecked. I know about the atomic_set function) is
> used for.

Isn't this a question for the grsecurity developers?

--
Thanks,
//richard


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-05-27 10:41    [W:0.028 / U:1.124 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site