lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [May]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 0/4] dma-mapping: Define dma_{alloc,free}_attrs() for all archs
Hello,
On 2013/04/30 12:01, Damian Hobson-Garcia wrote:
> Most architectures that define CONFIG_HAVE_DMA=y, have implementations for
> both dma_alloc_attrs() and dma_free_attrs(). All achitectures that do
> not define CONFIG_HAVE_DMA also have both of these definitions provided by
> dma-mapping-broken.h.
>
> Provide a default definition for the archs that define CONFIG_HAVE_DMA=y,
> but have no implementation for dma_{alloc,free}_attrs().
>
> As I don't have hardware for any of these systems, the patches are only
> compile-tested where I could (arm64, s390) and untested for the archs
> where I couldn't find a readily available prebuilt cross-compiler (c6x, parisc).
>


> arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 17 +++++++++++------
> arch/c6x/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 3 +++
> arch/parisc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 3 +++
> arch/s390/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 17 +++++++++++------
> 4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>

Since this series spans several architectures, what would be the best
way to have this patch series merged?
Should I resubmit each patch to the mailing list for each architecture
separately?

Thank you,
Damian

--
Damian Hobson-Garcia
IGEL Co.,Ltd
http://www.igel.co.jp


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-05-22 05:21    [W:0.113 / U:0.144 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site