Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 20 May 2013 10:49:46 +0300 (EEST) | From | Petko Manolov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/5] drivers: net: usb: rtl8150: bug fixing and cleanup |
| |
On Mon, 20 May 2013, David Miller wrote:
> From: Petko Manolov <petkan@nucleusys.com> > Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 10:18:17 +0300 (EEST) > > > On Mon, 20 May 2013, David Miller wrote: > > > >> From: Petko Manolov <petkan@nucleusys.com> > >> Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 10:09:00 +0300 (EEST) > >> > >> > What about the .c/.h split? > >> > >> I have no strong opinion either way. > > > > OK, so i'll prepare new patch series that coalesce my original patch #1 > > and #2, and apply the Francois suggestion about using the generic > > netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align() in the interrupt path. > > > > Which tree would you want me to diff against? > > As has been explained to you already, cleanups belong in 'net-next', > bug fixes belong in 'net'. > > If you series has both, you have to submit them separately. Submit > the bug fixes to 'net', then the next time I merge 'net' into 'net-next' > you can submit the cleanups on top against 'net-next'.
Got it. Thanks.
| |