Messages in this thread | | | From | Arnd Bergmann <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCHv3 3/6] clk: Add TI-Nspire clock drivers | Date | Mon, 20 May 2013 14:26:30 +0200 |
| |
On Monday 20 May 2013 21:19:33 Daniel Tang wrote: > On 20/05/2013, at 5:48 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > > > On Sunday 19 May 2013, Daniel Tang wrote: > >> If the vendors for the on-SOC components are unknown, should we just > >> leave the compatible strings as is (i.e. "nspire-XXX")? > > > > In that case, I would use the name of the company that made the SoC. > > I believe someone mentioned it was made by LSI logic. > > Yep, that's right. So "lsi,nspire-XXX" should be fine?
I wouldn't use that combination, since lsi did not make the nspire. For anything on the LSI chip, "lsi,zevio-XXX" would be correct, or maybe "lsi,zevio1020-XXX" for something specific to a particular SoC variant. For off-SoC parts, "ti,nspire-XXX" would be right, or "ti,nspire-cx-XXX" if you care about the model.
Arnd
| |