Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 2 May 2013 19:42:58 +0100 | From | Stefano Stabellini <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v10 0/2] (arm-soc for v3.10) arm: introduce psci_smp_ops |
| |
On Thu, 2 May 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 06:20:32PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Thu, 2 May 2013, Will Deacon wrote: > > > Hi Stefano, > > > > > > On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 06:12:12PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > > ping > > > > > > Is this a ping to have this pulled into Russell's tree? > > > > I thought that we agreed that the patches should go via the arm-soc > > tree, after Russell acks them. > > Okay, well, is there a reason for them to go through arm-soc? They > look more like core code to me than SoC specific - they only minimally > touch mach-virt.
The original reason is that some SoC specific code depends on this series (Calxeda I believe).
But you are probably right, if you prefer that I issue a pull request for your tree, I have no problems with that.
| |