Messages in this thread | | | From | Andreas Dilger <> | Subject | Re: Tux3 Report: Faster than tmpfs, what? | Date | Wed, 15 May 2013 11:10:52 -0600 |
| |
On 2013-05-14, at 0:25, Daniel Phillips <daniel.raymond.phillips@gmail.com> wrote: > Interesting, Andreas. We don't do anything as heavyweight as > allocating an inode in this path, just mark the inode dirty (which > puts it on a list) and set a bit in the inode flags.
The new inode allocation is only needed for the truncate-to-zero case. If the inode is being deleted it is used directly.
Sorry for confusion, it has been a long time since I looked at that code.
Cheers, Andreas
| |