lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [May]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Tux3 Report: Faster than tmpfs, what?
Date
On 2013-05-14, at 0:25, Daniel Phillips <daniel.raymond.phillips@gmail.com> wrote:
> Interesting, Andreas. We don't do anything as heavyweight as
> allocating an inode in this path, just mark the inode dirty (which
> puts it on a list) and set a bit in the inode flags.

The new inode allocation is only needed for the truncate-to-zero case. If the inode is being deleted it is used directly.

Sorry for confusion, it has been a long time since I looked at that code.

Cheers, Andreas

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-05-15 20:01    [W:0.058 / U:0.340 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site