Messages in this thread | | | From | OGAWA Hirofumi <> | Subject | Re: Tux3 Report: Faster than tmpfs, what? | Date | Tue, 14 May 2013 16:59:29 +0900 |
| |
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> writes:
>> Right. Because tux3 is not implementing fsync() yet. So, I did >> >> grep -v Flush /usr/share/dbench/client.txt > client2.txt >> >> Why is it important for comparing? > > Because nobody could reproduce your results without working that > out. You didn't disclose that you'd made these changes, and that > makes it extremely misleading as to what the results mean. Given the > headline-grab nature of it, it's deceptive at best. > > I don't care how fast tux3 is - I care about being able to reproduce > other people's results. Hence if you are going to report benchmark > results comparing filesystems then you need to tell everyone exactly > what you've tweaked and why, from the hardware all the way up to the > benchmark config.
Thanks for adivce. -- OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
| |