Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 14 May 2013 07:58:52 -0700 | From | "Christian Daudt" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 06/14] ARM: bcm281xx: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description |
| |
On 13-05-14 01:25 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi Christian, > > Le 13/05/2013 22:06, Christian Daudt a écrit : >> On 13-05-13 02:44 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: >>> Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is >>> specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in >>> the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that >>> declaration for bcm281xx as well. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> >>> --- >>> arch/arm/mach-bcm/board_bcm.c | 1 - >>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-bcm/board_bcm.c >>> b/arch/arm/mach-bcm/board_bcm.c >>> index 22e8421..24556cf 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-bcm/board_bcm.c >>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-bcm/board_bcm.c >>> @@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ static void __init board_init(void) >>> static const char * const bcm11351_dt_compat[] = { "bcm,bcm11351", >>> NULL, }; >>> DT_MACHINE_START(BCM11351_DT, "Broadcom Application Processor") >>> - .init_irq = irqchip_init, >>> .init_time = clocksource_of_init, >>> .init_machine = board_init, >>> .dt_compat = bcm11351_dt_compat, >> Acked-by: Christian Daudt <csd@broadcom.com> > Thanks! > > I forgot to remove the include of irqchip.h into all these patches, so > I'll send a v2, and I guess you could probably merge it through your > tree after that directly. Ok. will do.
thanks, csd
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |