Messages in this thread | | | From | "Zhang, Sonic" <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: i2c-bfin-twi: don`t free peripheral before it init successful | Date | Mon, 13 May 2013 08:52:11 +0000 |
| |
Hi Libo,
>-----Original Message----- >From: Libo Chen [mailto:clbchenlibo.chen@huawei.com] >Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 9:02 AM >To: Zhang, Sonic >Cc: Libo Chen; wsa@the-dreams.de; uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org; >linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org; lizefan@huawei.com >Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: i2c-bfin-twi: don`t free peripheral before it init >successful > >On 2013/5/9 16:33, Zhang, Sonic wrote: >> Hi Libo, >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Libo Chen [mailto:libo.chen@huawei.com] >>> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 4:27 PM >>> To: Zhang, Sonic; wsa@the-dreams.de >>> Cc: uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org; >>> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux- i2c@vger.kernel.org; >>> lizefan@huawei.com; Libo Chen >>> Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: i2c-bfin-twi: don`t free peripheral >>> before it init successful >>> >>> down out_error_no_irq. When platform_get_irq fail, no need to free >>> peripheral >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Libo Chen <libo.chen@huawei.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bfin-twi.c | 2 +- >>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bfin-twi.c >>> b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bfin-twi.c >>> index 05080c4..6617645 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bfin-twi.c >>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bfin-twi.c >>> @@ -709,9 +709,9 @@ static int i2c_bfin_twi_probe(struct >>> platform_device *pdev) >>> out_error_add_adapter: >>> free_irq(iface->irq, iface); >>> out_error_req_irq: >>> -out_error_no_irq: >>> peripheral_free_list((unsigned short >>> *)pdev->dev.platform_data); >>> out_error_pin_mux: >>> +out_error_no_irq: >>> iounmap(iface->regs_base); >>> out_error_ioremap: >>> out_error_get_res: >>> -- >> >> Sorry, but you didn't exchange as I suggested. >> Should be >> > >Hi Sonic, > >Look at peripheral_request_list() >{ > u16 cnt; > int ret; > > for (cnt = 0; per[cnt] != 0; cnt++) { > > ret = peripheral_request(per[cnt], label); > > if (ret < 0) { > for ( ; cnt > 0; cnt--) > peripheral_free(per[cnt - 1]); > > return ret; > } > } > > return 0; >} > > >When peripheral_request fail, it had called peripheral_free(). >So there is no reason to call peripheral_free_list again. > >Did I miss something else? > > Yes, you are right. They are freed in peripheral_request_list() if any one fails.
You have my ACK on this patch.
Regards,
Sonic
| |