Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 11 May 2013 11:35:45 -0700 | Subject | Re: Tux3 Report: Faster than tmpfs, what? | From | james northrup <> |
| |
also interesting information... Study of 2,047 papers on PubMed finds that two-thirds of retracted papers were down to scientific misconduct, not error
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Daniel Phillips <daniel.raymond.phillips@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > Thanks for the catch - I should indeed have noted that "modified > dbench" was used for this benchmark, thus amplifying Tux3's advantage > in delete performance. This literary oversight does not make the > results any less interesting: we beat Tmpfs on that particular load. > Beating tmpfs at anything is worthy of note. Obviously, all three
| |