lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Apr]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] memcg: make memcg's life cycle the same as cgroup
    On 04/07/2013 12:44 PM, Li Zefan wrote:
    > Hi,
    >
    > I'm rebasing this patchset against latest linux-next, and it conflicts with
    > "[PATCH v2] memcg: debugging facility to access dangling memcgs." slightly.
    >
    > That is a debugging patch and will never be pushed into mainline, so should I
    > still base this patchset on that debugging patch?
    >
    It will conflict as well with my shrinking patches: I will still keep
    the memcgs in the dangling list, but that will have nothing to do with
    debugging. So I will split that patch in a list management part, which
    will be used, and a debugging part (with the file + the debugging
    information).

    I will be happy to rebase it ontop of your series.

    > Also that patch needs update (and can be simplified) after this patchset:
    > - move memcg_dangling_add() to mem_cgroup_css_offline()
    > - remove memcg->memcg_name, and use cgroup_path() in mem_cgroup_dangling_read()?
    >

    Don't worry about it. If this is just this one patch conflicting, I
    would avise Andrew to remove it, and I will provide another (maybe two,
    already splitted up) version.



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2013-04-08 10:01    [W:6.031 / U:0.108 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site