Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 4 Apr 2013 15:18:32 +0200 (CEST) | From | Lukáš Czerner <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ext4 tree |
| |
On Thu, 4 Apr 2013, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 10:43:19 +1100 > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> > To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> > Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, > Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> > Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ext4 tree > > Hi Ted, > > After merging the ext4 tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: > > fs/ext4/resize.c: In function 'ext4_resize_fs': > fs/ext4/ext4.h:1799:21: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'ext4_get_group_number': function body not available > fs/ext4/resize.c:1882:10: sorry, unimplemented: called from here > fs/ext4/ext4.h:1799:21: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'ext4_get_group_number': function body not available > fs/ext4/resize.c:275:9: sorry, unimplemented: called from here > fs/ext4/ext4.h:1799:21: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'ext4_get_group_number': function body not available > fs/ext4/resize.c:287:9: sorry, unimplemented: called from here > fs/ext4/ext4.h:1799:21: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'ext4_get_group_number': function body not available > fs/ext4/resize.c:299:9: sorry, unimplemented: called from here > fs/ext4/mballoc.c: In function 'ext4_mb_release_context': > fs/ext4/ext4.h:1799:21: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'ext4_get_group_number': function body not available > fs/ext4/mballoc.c:3347:6: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
I am afraid I do not understand why this is happening. The commit simply replaces ext4_get_group_no_and_offset() with ext4_get_group_number() which has the similar definition in the same header file. Maybe someone knows what this is all about ?
> > Caused by commit dc351389caa5 ("ext4: introduce ext4_get_group_number()"). > > This build was done with gcc 4.6.3 if that matters. > > I have used the ext4 tree from next-20130403 for today. >
| |