lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Apr]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] sched: wake-affine throttle
    On 04/22/2013 06:23 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
    >
    > OK,.. Ingo said that pipe-test was the original motivation for
    > wake_affine() and since that's currently broken to pieces due to
    > select_idle_sibling() is there still a benefit to having it at all?
    >
    > Can anybody find any significant regression when simply killing
    > wake_affine()?

    Is it time for us to make the decision now?

    Forgive me for urge the progress, but I really confused what is stopping
    us from adopt the throttle approach...

    Is there any other option more simple, safe and faster?

    Regards,
    Michael Wang

    >
    >
    > --
    > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
    >



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2013-04-27 05:01    [W:2.358 / U:0.020 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site