Messages in this thread | | | From | Shuah Khan <> | Subject | Re: [ 00/42] 3.8.9-stable review | Date | Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:23:32 +0000 |
| |
On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 14:51 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.8.9 release. > There are 42 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu Apr 25 21:50:11 UTC 2013. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.8.9-rc1.gz > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h >
Patches applied cleanly to 3.0.74, 3.4.41, and 3.8.8
Reviewing patches - will let you know anything odd.
Compiled and booted on the following systems:
Samsung Series 9 Intel Corei5 HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics
dmesgs for all releases look good. No regressions compared to the previous dmesgs for each of these releases.
Cross-compile tests results:
alpha: defconfig passed on all arm: defconfig passed on all arm64: not applicable to 3.0.y, 3.4.y. defconfig passed on 3.8.y c6x: not applicable to 3.0.y, defconfig passed on 3.4.y, and 3.8.y. mips: defconfig passed on all mipsel: defconfig passed on all powerpc: wii_defconfig passed on all sh: defconfig passed on all sparc: defconfig passed on all tile: tilegx_defconfig passed on all
Samsung Series 9 Intel Corei5: Note: Screaming fast system with ssd!! There are some vga issues on 3.0.74 and 3.0.75-rc1 on this system and I am going to investigate those and see what's going on. No problems with 3.4 and 3.8. My current guess is that 3.5 is the minimum for this system.
thanks, -- Shuah
| |