[lkml]   [2013]   [Apr]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 18/19] ARM: at91: suspend both memory controllers on at91sam9263
On 04/18/2013 04:15 PM, Arnd Bergmann :
> On Thursday 18 April 2013, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>>> This patch blindly removes the warning and changes the
>>> at91sam9263 to use the same code at at91sam9g45, which
>>> may or may not be the right solution. If it is not,
>>> maybe someone could provide a better fix.
>> Maybe you can remove this paragraph: now you are using the proper fix
>> with proper RAM type.
>>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <>
>>> Cc: Nicolas Ferre <>
>> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <>
>> What is the future of this patch series: do you want us to take this
>> patch separately or to you want to apply the whole series on the arm-soc
>> tree?
> I'd prefer if you could just apply or forward it to an appropriate tree.
> Most of the other patches have found their way into mainline by now.
>>> Cc: Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <>
>>> Cc: Andrew Victor <>
>>> Cc: Albin Tonnerre <>
>>> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <>
>> Moreover, this patch my conflict with Daniel's current initiative to
>> move cpuidle driver to its own directory: how do we coordinate with each
>> other?
> Maybe you can make sure it actually works and send it to Daniel to apply on
> top of his other patches?

Well, as Daniel's patches are still under construction, I stack this one
on the at91-3.10-soc branch and let Daniel rebase his work on top of a
3.10-rc1-ish tree...

Best regards,
Nicolas Ferre

 \ /
  Last update: 2013-04-18 17:01    [W:0.070 / U:8.248 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site