lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Apr]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v9 09/16] PCI, x86: implement pcibios_{add|remove}_bus() hooks
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 2:27 PM, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Apr 2013, Jiang Liu wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/common.c b/arch/x86/pci/common.c
>> index 901177d..305c68b 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/pci/common.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/common.c
>> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>>
>> #include <linux/sched.h>
>> #include <linux/pci.h>
>> +#include <linux/pci-acpi.h>
>> #include <linux/ioport.h>
>> #include <linux/init.h>
>> #include <linux/dmi.h>
>> @@ -170,6 +171,16 @@ void pcibios_fixup_bus(struct pci_bus *b)
>> pcibios_fixup_device_resources(dev);
>> }
>>
>> +void pcibios_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
>> +{
>> + acpi_pci_add_bus(bus);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void pcibios_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
>> +{
>> + acpi_pci_remove_bus(bus);
>> +}
>> +
>> /*
>> * Only use DMI information to set this if nothing was passed
>> * on the kernel command line (which was parsed earlier).
>
> This causes build errors when CONFIG_ACPI isn't enabled since both
> acpi_pci_{add,remove}_bus() aren't defined in such a configuration:
>
> arch/x86/pci/common.c: In function 'pcibios_add_bus':
> arch/x86/pci/common.c:176:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'acpi_pci_add_bus'
> arch/x86/pci/common.c: In function 'pcibios_remove_bus':
> arch/x86/pci/common.c:181:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'acpi_pci_remove_bus'

Thanks for the report!

I'm pretty sure I fixed this:
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci.git/commit/?h=pci/jiang-subdrivers&id=3b63aaa70e1ccc4b66d60acc78da09700706a703

The acpi_pci_add_bus()/acpi_pci_remove_bus() stubs for CONFIG_ACPI=n
were added early in the series (patch 07/16: "PCI/ACPI: Prepare stub
functions to handle ACPI PCI (hotplug) slots") but were mistakenly
removed in patch 12/16: "PCI: acpiphp: Do not use ACPI PCI subdriver
mechanism".

I updated my "next" branch with the fixed version of patch 12/16, so
the 20130417 linux-next tree should have the fix.

Bjorn


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-04-17 01:21    [W:0.312 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site