lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Apr]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: drivers/base/core.c: about device_find_child() function
On 04/12/2013 02:09 PM, Federico Vaga wrote:
> [...]
>
> [**] (argumentation based, obviously, on my limited understanding)
>
> These drivers work like this:
>
> child = device_find_child(parent, data, match_function);
> if (child) {
> put_device(child);
> <do something unrelated with child>
> }
>
> In these cases we do not need to get_device(). But we need to know if there
> is a child that match a rule. It can also "disapper" after the
> put_device(child) but the driver continues on its way because it does not
> use the child. For example virtio_rpmsg_bus.c:
>
> /* make sure a similar channel doesn't already exist */
> tmp = device_find_child(dev, chinfo, rpmsg_channel_match);
> if (tmp) {
> /* decrement the matched device's refcount back */
> put_device(tmp);
> dev_err(dev, "channel %s:%x:%x already exist\n",
> chinfo->name, chinfo->src, chinfo->dst);
> return NULL;
> }

Considering that there seems to be a common pattern here where the caller
only wants to know if the device exists, but is not really interested in the
device itself, how about adding a helper function for this?

- Lars


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-04-13 12:01    [from the cache]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and my Meterkast|Read the blog