Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 10 Apr 2013 20:55:19 -0500 | | From | Rob Landley <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCHv9 2/8] zsmalloc: add documentation |
| |
On 04/10/2013 01:18:54 PM, Seth Jennings wrote: > This patch adds a documentation file for zsmalloc at > Documentation/vm/zsmalloc.txt
Docs acked-by: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
Literary criticism below:
> Signed-off-by: Seth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > --- > Documentation/vm/zsmalloc.txt | 68 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/vm/zsmalloc.txt > > diff --git a/Documentation/vm/zsmalloc.txt > b/Documentation/vm/zsmalloc.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..85aa617 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/vm/zsmalloc.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ > +zsmalloc Memory Allocator > + > +Overview > + > +zmalloc a new slab-based memory allocator, > +zsmalloc, for storing compressed pages.
zmalloc a new slab-based memory allocator, zsmalloc? (How does one zmalloc zsmalloc?)
Out of curiosity, what does zsmalloc stand for, anyway?
> It is designed for > +low fragmentation and high allocation success rate on > +large object, but <= PAGE_SIZE allocations.
1) objects
2) maybe "large objects for <= PAGE_SIZE"...
> +zsmalloc differs from the kernel slab allocator in two primary > +ways to achieve these design goals. > + > +zsmalloc never requires high order page allocations to back > +slabs, or "size classes" in zsmalloc terms. Instead it allows > +multiple single-order pages to be stitched together into a > +"zspage" which backs the slab. This allows for higher allocation > +success rate under memory pressure. > + > +Also, zsmalloc allows objects to span page boundaries within the > +zspage. This allows for lower fragmentation than could be had > +with the kernel slab allocator for objects between PAGE_SIZE/2 > +and PAGE_SIZE. With the kernel slab allocator, if a page compresses > +to 60% of it original size, the memory savings gained through > +compression is lost in fragmentation because another object of
I lean towards "are lost", but it's debatable. (Savings are plural, but savings could also be treated as a mass noun like water/air/bison that doesn't get pluralized because you can't count instances of a liquid. No idea which is more common.)
> +the same size can't be stored in the leftover space. > + > +This ability to span pages results in zsmalloc allocations not being > +directly addressable by the user. The user is given an > +non-dereferencable handle in response to an allocation request. > +That handle must be mapped, using zs_map_object(), which returns > +a pointer to the mapped region that can be used. The mapping is > +necessary since the object data may reside in two different > +noncontigious pages.
Presumably this allows packing of unmapped entities if you detect fragmentation and are up for a latency spike?
Rob
|  |