lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Apr]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/5] sched: factor out code to should_we_balance()
    Hello, Peter.

    On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 12:45:14PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
    > On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 16:58 +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
    > > There is not enough reason to place this checking at
    > > update_sg_lb_stats(),
    > > except saving one iteration for sched_group_cpus. But with this
    > > change,
    > > we can save two memset cost and can expect better compiler
    > > optimization,
    > > so clean-up may be more beneficial to us.
    >
    > It would be good if you'd described what you actually did, there's a
    > lot of code movement and now I have to figure out wth you did and why.

    Okay. I will do that when respin.

    Thanks.

    > --
    > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2013-04-01 07:41    [W:4.136 / U:0.296 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site