lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Mar]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] ARM: perf: Fix section mismatch on armpmu_init()
Date
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0xfb80): Section mismatch in reference
from the function armpmu_register() to the function
.init.text:armpmu_init()
The function armpmu_register() references
the function __init armpmu_init().
This is often because armpmu_register lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of armpmu_init is wrong.

Just drop the __init marking on armpmu_init() because
armpmu_register() no longer has an __init marking.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
---

I doubt anyone is actually experiencing any problems because this
driver probes before kernel init is over. But the warning is a bit
annoying.

arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
index 31e0eb3..32081ad 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ const struct dev_pm_ops armpmu_dev_pm_ops = {
SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(armpmu_runtime_suspend, armpmu_runtime_resume, NULL)
};

-static void __init armpmu_init(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
+static void armpmu_init(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
{
atomic_set(&armpmu->active_events, 0);
mutex_init(&armpmu->reserve_mutex);
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-03-05 00:41    [W:0.051 / U:0.252 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site