lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Mar]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    Subjectmakedumpfile mmap() benchmark
    Hi,

    I have tested the makedumpfile mmap patch on a machine with 2TB memory,
    here is testing results:
    Test environment:
    Machine: HP ProLiant DL980 G7 with 2TB RAM.
    CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7- 2860 @ 2.27GHz (8 sockets, 10 cores)
    (Only 1 cpu was enabled the 2nd kernel)
    Kernel: 3.9.0-rc3+ with mmap kernel patch v3
    vmcore size: 2.0TB
    Dump file size: 3.6GB
    makedumpfile mmap branch with parameters: -c --message-level 23 -d 31
    --map-size <map-size>
    All measured time from debug message of makedumpfile.

    As a comparison, I also have tested with original kernel and original
    makedumpfile 1.5.1 and 1.5.3.
    I added all [Excluding unnecessary pages] and [Excluding free pages]
    time together as "Filter Pages", and [Copyying Data] as "Copy data" here.

    makedumjpfile Kernel map-size (KB) Filter pages (s) Copy data (s) Total (s)
    1.5.1 3.7.0-0.36.el7.x86_64 N/A 940.28 1269.25 2209.53
    1.5.3 3.7.0-0.36.el7.x86_64 N/A 380.09 992.77 1372.86
    1.5.3 v3.9-rc3 N/A 197.77 892.27 1090.04
    1.5.3+mmap v3.9-rc3+mmap 0 164.87 606.06 770.93
    1.5.3+mmap v3.9-rc3+mmap 4 88.62 576.07 664.69
    1.5.3+mmap v3.9-rc3+mmap 1024 83.66 477.23 560.89
    1.5.3+mmap v3.9-rc3+mmap 2048 83.44 477.21 560.65
    1.5.3+mmap v3.9-rc3+mmap 10240 83.84 476.56 560.4


    Thanks,
    Jingbai Ma


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2013-03-27 07:01    [W:0.023 / U:61.992 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site