lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Mar]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH V2] lglock: add read-preference local-global rwlock
On 03/02/2013 06:44 PM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> From 345a7a75c314ff567be48983e0892bc69c4452e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2013 20:33:14 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] lglock: add read-preference local-global rwlock
>
> Current lglock is not read-preference, so it can't be used on some cases
> which read-preference rwlock can do. Example, get_cpu_online_atomic().
>
[...]
> diff --git a/kernel/lglock.c b/kernel/lglock.c
> index 6535a66..52e9b2c 100644
> --- a/kernel/lglock.c
> +++ b/kernel/lglock.c
> @@ -87,3 +87,71 @@ void lg_global_unlock(struct lglock *lg)
> preempt_enable();
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(lg_global_unlock);
> +
> +#define FALLBACK_BASE (1UL << 30)
> +
> +void lg_rwlock_local_read_lock(struct lgrwlock *lgrw)
> +{
> + struct lglock *lg = &lgrw->lglock;
> +
> + preempt_disable();
> + if (likely(!__this_cpu_read(*lgrw->reader_refcnt))) {
> + rwlock_acquire_read(&lg->lock_dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
> + if (unlikely(!arch_spin_trylock(this_cpu_ptr(lg->lock)))) {
> + read_lock(&lgrw->fallback_rwlock);
> + __this_cpu_write(*lgrw->reader_refcnt, FALLBACK_BASE);
> + return;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + __this_cpu_inc(*lgrw->reader_refcnt);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(lg_rwlock_local_read_lock);
> +
> +void lg_rwlock_local_read_unlock(struct lgrwlock *lgrw)
> +{
> + switch (__this_cpu_read(*lgrw->reader_refcnt)) {
> + case 1:
> + __this_cpu_write(*lgrw->reader_refcnt, 0);
> + lg_local_unlock(&lgrw->lglock);
> + return;

This should be a break, instead of a return, right?
Otherwise, there will be a preempt imbalance...

> + case FALLBACK_BASE:
> + __this_cpu_write(*lgrw->reader_refcnt, 0);
> + read_unlock(&lgrw->fallback_rwlock);
> + rwlock_release(&lg->lock_dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
> + break;
> + default:
> + __this_cpu_dec(*lgrw->reader_refcnt);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + preempt_enable();
> +}


Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-03-02 18:41    [W:3.096 / U:0.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site