lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Mar]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: sched: CPU #1's llc-sibling CPU #0 is not on the same node!

* Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:37:10PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > I'd be very happy to get the NUMAQ code ripped out. I am wondering if
> > there are any reasons to keep any 32-bit x86 NUMA code at all.
>
> How much would it hurt us if we said 3.8 is the last kernel that supported NUMAQ?
> If anyone wants the functionality, they should use 3.8 or older.

v3.9 - any non-trivial patch in the stage of being contemplated near the end of the
v3.9 merge window is most likely v3.10 material.

Thanks,

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-03-01 13:21    [W:0.111 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site