Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 1 Mar 2013 12:24:32 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: sched: CPU #1's llc-sibling CPU #0 is not on the same node! |
| |
* Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:37:10PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > I'd be very happy to get the NUMAQ code ripped out. I am wondering if > > there are any reasons to keep any 32-bit x86 NUMA code at all. > > How much would it hurt us if we said 3.8 is the last kernel that supported NUMAQ? > If anyone wants the functionality, they should use 3.8 or older.
v3.9 - any non-trivial patch in the stage of being contemplated near the end of the v3.9 merge window is most likely v3.10 material.
Thanks,
Ingo
| |