lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/8] Thermal: Add APIs to bind cdev to new zone structure
From
Date
On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 16:16 +0530, Durgadoss R wrote:
> This patch creates new APIs to add/remove a
> cdev to/from a zone. This patch does not change
> the old cooling device implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/thermal_sys.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/thermal.h | 9 +++++
> 2 files changed, 89 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_sys.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_sys.c
> index 838d4fb..bf703b1 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_sys.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_sys.c
> @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(thermal_governor_list);
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(thermal_list_lock);
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(sensor_list_lock);
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(zone_list_lock);
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(cdev_list_lock);
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(thermal_governor_lock);
>
> #define for_each_thermal_sensor(pos) \
> @@ -83,6 +84,9 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(thermal_governor_lock);
> ret; \
> })
>
> +#define for_each_cdev(pos) \
> + list_for_each_entry(pos, &thermal_cdev_list, node)
> +
> static struct thermal_governor *__find_governor(const char *name)
> {
> struct thermal_governor *pos;
> @@ -466,6 +470,24 @@ static void remove_sensor_from_zone(struct thermal_zone *tz,
> tz->sensor_indx--;
> }
>
> +static void remove_cdev_from_zone(struct thermal_zone *tz,
> + struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev)
> +{
> + int j, indx;
> +
> + indx = GET_INDEX(tz, cdev, cdev);
> + if (indx < 0)
> + return;
> +
> + sysfs_remove_link(&tz->device.kobj, kobject_name(&cdev->device.kobj));
> +
> + /* Shift the entries in the tz->cdevs array */
> + for (j = indx; j < MAX_CDEVS_PER_ZONE - 1; j++)
> + tz->cdevs[j] = tz->cdevs[j + 1];
> +
> + tz->cdev_indx--;
> +}
> +
> /* sys I/F for thermal zone */
>
> #define to_thermal_zone(_dev) \
> @@ -1462,6 +1484,7 @@ void thermal_cooling_device_unregister(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev)
> int i;
> const struct thermal_zone_params *tzp;
> struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
> + struct thermal_zone *tmp_tz;
> struct thermal_cooling_device *pos = NULL;
>
> if (!cdev)
> @@ -1499,6 +1522,13 @@ void thermal_cooling_device_unregister(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev)
>
> mutex_unlock(&thermal_list_lock);
>
> + mutex_lock(&zone_list_lock);
> +
> + for_each_thermal_zone(tmp_tz)
> + remove_cdev_from_zone(tmp_tz, cdev);
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&zone_list_lock);
> +
> if (cdev->type[0])
> device_remove_file(&cdev->device, &dev_attr_cdev_type);
> device_remove_file(&cdev->device, &dev_attr_max_state);
> @@ -1794,6 +1824,23 @@ exit:
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(remove_thermal_zone);
>
> +struct thermal_cooling_device *get_cdev_by_name(const char *name)
> +{
> + struct thermal_cooling_device *pos;
> + struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev = NULL;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&cdev_list_lock);
> + for_each_cdev(pos) {
> + if (!strnicmp(pos->type, name, THERMAL_NAME_LENGTH)) {
> + cdev = pos;
> + break;
the same comments as the Patch 2/8.

> + }
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&cdev_list_lock);
> + return cdev;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_cdev_by_name);
> +
> struct thermal_sensor *get_sensor_by_name(const char *name)
> {
> struct thermal_sensor *pos;
> @@ -1844,6 +1891,39 @@ exit_zone:
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(add_sensor_to_zone);
>
> +int add_cdev_to_zone(struct thermal_zone *tz,
> + struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!tz || !cdev)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&zone_list_lock);
> +
> + /* Ensure we are not adding the same cdev again!! */
> + ret = GET_INDEX(tz, cdev, cdev);
> + if (ret >= 0) {
> + ret = -EEXIST;
> + goto exit_zone;
> + }
> +
> + mutex_lock(&cdev_list_lock);
> + ret = sysfs_create_link(&tz->device.kobj, &cdev->device.kobj,
> + kobject_name(&cdev->device.kobj));
> + if (ret)
> + goto exit_cdev;
> +
> + tz->cdevs[tz->cdev_indx++] = cdev;
> +
> +exit_cdev:
> + mutex_unlock(&cdev_list_lock);
> +exit_zone:
> + mutex_unlock(&zone_list_lock);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(add_cdev_to_zone);
> +
Hmmm,
I'd prefer to see the code organized in this way:
/* thermal zone APIs/
thermal_zone_device_register()
thermal_zone_device_unregister()
add_thermal_zone()
remove_thermal_zone()

/* sensor APIs */
thermal_sensor_register()
thermal_sensor_unregister()
add_sensor_to_zone()
remove_sensor_from_zone()

/* cdev APIs */
thermal_cooling_device_register()
thermal_cooling_device_unregister()
add_cdev_to_zone()
remove_cdev_from_zone()

/* helper APIs */
get_sensor_by_name()
get_cdev_by_name()

but if this makes your rebase MUCH more difficult, I think we can
generate an incremental cleanup patch instead.

thanks,
rui




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-02-08 10:01    [W:0.279 / U:3.116 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site