lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRE: [PATCH 1/8] Thermal: Create sensor level APIs
From
Date
On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 01:26 -0700, R, Durgadoss wrote:
> Hi Rui,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Zhang, Rui
> > Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 1:24 PM
> > To: R, Durgadoss
> > Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> > eduardo.valentin@ti.com; hongbo.zhang@linaro.org; wni@nvidia.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] Thermal: Create sensor level APIs
> >
> > On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 16:16 +0530, Durgadoss R wrote:
> > > This patch creates sensor level APIs, in the
> > > generic thermal framework.
>
> [snip.]
>
> > > +
> > > static ssize_t
> > > type_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> > > {
> > > @@ -707,6 +807,10 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR(mode, 0644, mode_show,
> > mode_store);
> > > static DEVICE_ATTR(passive, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR, passive_show,
> > passive_store);
> > > static DEVICE_ATTR(policy, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR, policy_show,
> > policy_store);
> > >
> > > +/* Thermal sensor attributes */
> > > +static DEVICE_ATTR(sensor_name, 0444, sensor_name_show, NULL);
> > > +static DEVICE_ATTR(temp_input, 0444, sensor_temp_show, NULL);
> > > +
> > > /* sys I/F for cooling device */
> > > #define to_cooling_device(_dev) \
> > > container_of(_dev, struct thermal_cooling_device, device)
> > > @@ -1493,6 +1597,182 @@ static void remove_trip_attrs(struct
> > thermal_zone_device *tz)
> > > }
> > >
> > > /**
> > > + * enable_sensor_thresholds - create sysfs nodes for thresholdX
> >
> > this is a little confusing.
> > I'd prefer
> > thermal_sensor_sysfs_add() and create sensor_name and temp_input
> > attribute in this function as well, and thermal_sensor_sysfs_remove()
> > to remove the sysfs I/F.
> > And further more, we can do this for thermal zones and cooling devices.
>
> I agree, and we will change this.
> Since this involves change for all standard APIs, I think it is better to submit
> a separate patch to do this. What do you think ?
>
I'm okay with this.

thanks,
rui
> >
> > others look okay to me.
>
> Thank you :-)
>
> >
> > thanks,
> > rui
>




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-02-08 11:42    [W:0.071 / U:28.892 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site