Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 7 Feb 2013 15:13:55 +1100 | From | Anton Blanchard <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/4] audit: Syscall rules are not applied to existing processes on non-x86 |
| |
Hi,
Just following up on this. I've had a few people complaining about audit being broken on ppc64 and it would be nice to fix.
Anton --
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 10:46:17 +1100 Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> wrote:
> > Commit b05d8447e782 (audit: inline audit_syscall_entry to reduce > burden on archs) changed audit_syscall_entry to check for a dummy > context before calling __audit_syscall_entry. Unfortunately the dummy > context state is maintained in __audit_syscall_entry so once set it > never gets cleared, even if the audit rules change. > > As a result, if there are no auditing rules when a process starts > then it will never be subject to any rules added later. x86 doesn't > see this because it has an assembly fast path that calls directly into > __audit_syscall_entry. > > I noticed this issue when working on audit performance optimisations. > I wrote a set of simple test cases available at: > > http://ozlabs.org/~anton/junkcode/audit_tests.tar.gz > > 02_new_rule.py fails without the patch and passes with it. The > test case clears all rules, starts a process, adds a rule then > verifies the process produces a syscall audit record. > > Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> > Cc: <stable@kernel.org> # 3.3+ > --- > > Index: b/include/linux/audit.h > =================================================================== > --- a/include/linux/audit.h > +++ b/include/linux/audit.h > @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ static inline void audit_syscall_entry(i > unsigned long a1, unsigned > long a2, unsigned long a3) > { > - if (unlikely(!audit_dummy_context())) > + if (unlikely(current->audit_context)) > __audit_syscall_entry(arch, major, a0, a1, a2, a3); > } > static inline void audit_syscall_exit(void *pt_regs)
| |