Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC 2/2] initramfs with digital signature protection | From | Mimi Zohar <> | Date | Tue, 05 Feb 2013 15:08:50 -0500 |
| |
On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 13:03 -0500, Peter Jones wrote:
> It's not clear to me why we need this encapsulation - wouldn't it be > better to add another [pointer,size] pair to the bootloader protocol > with a structure like:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/30/68 was in response to the assumption that the initramfs is measured/appraised. These patches attempt to address those concerns.
Mimi
| |