[lkml]   [2013]   [Feb]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC 2/2] initramfs with digital signature protection
On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 13:03 -0500, Peter Jones wrote:

> It's not clear to me why we need this encapsulation - wouldn't it be
> better to add another [pointer,size] pair to the bootloader protocol
> with a structure like: was in response to the assumption
that the initramfs is measured/appraised. These patches attempt to
address those concerns.


 \ /
  Last update: 2013-02-05 22:23    [W:0.178 / U:2.464 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site