lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Feb]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH 0/2] cpufreq: cpufreq_driver_lock is hot on large systems
Date
Ok, I'll rebase and retest from linux-next then.


________________________________________
From: Rafael J. Wysocki [rjw@sisk.pl]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 4:13 AM
To: Viresh Kumar
Cc: Nathan Zimmer; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-pm@vger.kernel.org; cpufreq@vger.kernel.org; Shawn Guo; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpufreq: cpufreq_driver_lock is hot on large systems

On Tuesday, February 05, 2013 03:28:30 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > I actually don't agree with that, becuase the Nathan's apprach shows the
> > reasoning that leads to the RCU introduction quite clearly. So if you
> > don't have technical problems with the patchset, I'm going to take it as is.
>
> Great!!
>
> Okay.. I don't have any technical problems with it, i reviewed most of it
> carefully. The only pending thing is rebase on linux-next, after that i can
> give my ack for it.

Yes, it would be great if it were rebased and retested.

Thanks,
Rafael


--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-02-05 16:43    [W:0.163 / U:2.940 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site