Messages in this thread | | | From | Bing Zhao <> | Date | Mon, 4 Feb 2013 16:36:46 -0800 | Subject | RE: [ 014/128] mwifiex: wakeup and stop multiple tx queues in net_device |
| |
Hi Ben,
> On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 11:43 -0800, Bing Zhao wrote: > > Hi Ben, > > > > > 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > > > > ------------------ > > > > > > From: Avinash Patil <patila@marvell.com> > > > > > > commit bbea3bc432dc5c08d09ca5c80afdd82515470688 upstream. > > > > This patch is not for stable kernel. > [...] > > Right, I've managed to pick up 3 changes to mwifiex that it looks like I > shouldn't have included. Firstly: > > 9c969d8ccb1e mwifiex: check wait_event_interruptible return value > > This had "3.6+" to the left of <stable@vger.kernel.org>, whereas I > expect version qualifiers to be on the right. So my import script just > put this in the queue without asking me to interpret the version > qualifier. (I don't automate *that* because people use too wide a > variety of syntaxes.)
Sorry. From now on I will put version qualifiers on the right side of <stable@vger...>
> > When trying to apply that, I found that it seemed to depend on these > two: > > bbea3bc432dc mwifiex: wakeup and stop multiple tx queues in net_device
I'd rather classify this patch as an enhancement because the code change is relatively large. To play it safe, let's drop this patch from -stable.
> b7097eb75fa1 mwifiex: handle association failure case correctly
This is a bug fix indeed.
> > which also looked like they were important fixes. Presumably I should > drop all of those?
Please drop bbea3bc432dc only.
I can resend a backport of "b7097eb75fa1 mwifiex: handle association failure case correctly" for 3.2-stable.
Thanks, Bing
| |