lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Feb]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] config: fix make kvmconfig

* Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:57:35AM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 Feb 2013, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > > > arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > > > index 6979498..f9459b3 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > > > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > > > @@ -606,6 +606,7 @@ config KVMTOOL_TEST_ENABLE
> > > > select NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS
> > > > select INET
> > > > select EXPERIMENTAL
> > > > + select TTY
> > > > select SERIAL_8250
> > > > select SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE
> > > > select IP_PNP
> > >
> > > There's no 'config TTY' in the kernel AFAICS.
> > >
> >
> > It's added in linux-next by 4f73bc4dd3e8 ("tty: Added a CONFIG_TTY option
> > to allow removal of TTY").
> >
> > Adding Greg to the cc to figure out which tree this should be merged
> > through. Greg, please find the patch inline.
>
> Ideally it would go through my tree, but it can't because
> KVMTOOL_TEST_ENABLE isn't in my tree :(
>
> I suggest just adding it to whatever tree this change is in,
> it doesn't "hurt" to enable a config option that isn't in the
> tree at the moment, right? Or will Kconfig complain about it?

Yeah, that's a good idea - I think Pekka can apply that change
just fine to help anyone doing merges - I don't think kconfig
treats it as a fatal error.

Thanks,

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-02-04 21:25    [W:0.107 / U:22.908 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site