Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | "Raphael S.Carvalho" <> | Subject | [PATCH 1/1] kernel/nsproxy.c: Improving a snippet of code. | Date | Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:32:09 -0300 |
| |
It seems GCC generates a better code in that way, so I changed that statement. Btw, they have the same semantic, so I'm sending this patch due to performance issues.
Signed-off-by: Raphael S.Carvalho <raphael.scarv@gmail.com> --- kernel/nsproxy.c | 3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/nsproxy.c b/kernel/nsproxy.c index 78e2ecb..21da3d1 100644 --- a/kernel/nsproxy.c +++ b/kernel/nsproxy.c @@ -148,7 +148,8 @@ int copy_namespaces(unsigned long flags, struct task_struct *tsk) * means share undolist with parent, so we must forbid using * it along with CLONE_NEWIPC. */ - if ((flags & CLONE_NEWIPC) && (flags & CLONE_SYSVSEM)) { + if ((flags & (CLONE_NEWIPC | CLONE_SYSVSEM)) == + (CLONE_NEWIPC | CLONE_SYSVSEM)) { err = -EINVAL; goto out; } -- 1.7.2.5
| |