Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:27:50 -0800 | From | Tejun Heo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH V2 13/15] workqueue: also record worker in work->data if running&&queued |
| |
Hello, Lai.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:04:31PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > (But are patch 1, 5-8 possible merged after rebased and revised?)
0001 is problematic because it adds a hash lookup which isn't necessary. In this series, it's okay as the later lookup is removed eventually but without that, I don't think it's a good idea to apply 0001.
0002 looks good to me.
0005, I'm not sure what the benefit would be without later changes.
0006-0008 yeah, probably.
I'll try to apply them on top of wq/for-3.9.
Thanks.
-- tejun
| |