Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:20:16 -0500 | From | Aristeu Rozanski <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] devcg: propagate local changes down the hierarchy |
| |
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:12:08PM +0000, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Aristeu Rozanski (aris@redhat.com): > > + } else { > > + /* > > + * in the other possible cases: > > + * root's behavior: allow, devcg's: deny > > + * root's behavior: deny, devcg's: deny > > + * the exception will be removed > > + */ > > Technically this case isn't needed, right? Will the dev_exception_rm() > also be done by revalidate_active_exceptions()? So it's safe (but > not necessary) to drop the else here. Though the comment is very > informative, and it might be worth keeping the code as is for clarity.
that's correct, it'll end up being removed by revalidate_active_exceptions(). if others have no objection, I'll keep it
Thanks for the reviews Serge, much appreciated
-- Aristeu
| |