Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC] sched: The removal of idle_balance() | From | Mike Galbraith <> | Date | Mon, 18 Feb 2013 04:42:33 +0100 |
| |
On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 16:54 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 08:14 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > (And puts a dent in x264 ultrafast)
> What about my last patch? The one that avoids idle_balance() if the > previous task was in a task_uninterruptible state. That one gave the > same performance increase that removing idle_balance() did on my box.
I didn't try it, figuring it was pretty much the same as turning it off, but just did. Patch (-typo) has no effect on either x264 or hackbench (surely will for -rt, but rt tasks here aren't sent to burn in rt hell).
-Mike
| |