Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <> | Subject | [PATCH 06/16] softirq: Add more debugging | Date | Wed, 13 Feb 2013 17:12:01 +0100 |
| |
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
We really want to find code which calls __raise_softirq_irqsoff() and runs neither in hardirq context nor in a local_bh disabled region. This is even wrong on mainline as that code relies on random events to take care of it's newly raised softirq.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> --- kernel/softirq.c | 16 +++++++++------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c index 66999ad..385fcea 100644 --- a/kernel/softirq.c +++ b/kernel/softirq.c @@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ void thread_do_softirq(void) } } -void __raise_softirq_irqoff(unsigned int nr) +static void do_raise_softirq_irqoff(unsigned int nr) { trace_softirq_raise(nr); or_softirq_pending(1UL << nr); @@ -622,12 +622,19 @@ void __raise_softirq_irqoff(unsigned int nr) __this_cpu_read(ksoftirqd)->softirqs_raised |= (1U << nr); } +void __raise_softirq_irqoff(unsigned int nr) +{ + do_raise_softirq_irqoff(nr); + if (!in_irq() && !current->softirq_nestcnt) + wakeup_softirqd(); +} + /* * This function must run with irqs disabled! */ void raise_softirq_irqoff(unsigned int nr) { - __raise_softirq_irqoff(nr); + do_raise_softirq_irqoff(nr); /* * If we're in an hard interrupt we let irq return code deal @@ -649,11 +656,6 @@ void raise_softirq_irqoff(unsigned int nr) wakeup_softirqd(); } -void do_raise_softirq_irqoff(unsigned int nr) -{ - raise_softirq_irqoff(nr); -} - static inline int ksoftirqd_softirq_pending(void) { return current->softirqs_raised; -- 1.7.10.4
| |