lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Feb]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Should SPARC use cpuidle? (was: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (acpi tree related))
> 
> > Do you btw. have any hints how I can convert to the cpu_idle thing you hinted?
>
> If you have exactly 1 idle state, then cpuidle isn't that interesting,
> except, perhaps the standard residency counters. If you have multiple
> states to choose from, cpuidle becomes more valuable.
>
> There are lots of cpuidle users now, including x86's intel_idle,
> processor_idle, and the entire ARM tree.

I think LEON has only a single power-down state.
The APC stuff I know nothing about :-(

So for now I think I will let it be as it is then.

Sam


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-02-12 21:42    [W:0.052 / U:0.332 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site