Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 12 Feb 2013 20:42:32 +0100 | From | Sam Ravnborg <> | Subject | Re: Should SPARC use cpuidle? (was: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (acpi tree related)) |
| |
> > > Do you btw. have any hints how I can convert to the cpu_idle thing you hinted? > > If you have exactly 1 idle state, then cpuidle isn't that interesting, > except, perhaps the standard residency counters. If you have multiple > states to choose from, cpuidle becomes more valuable. > > There are lots of cpuidle users now, including x86's intel_idle, > processor_idle, and the entire ARM tree.
I think LEON has only a single power-down state. The APC stuff I know nothing about :-(
So for now I think I will let it be as it is then.
Sam
| |