Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 6 Dec 2013 07:39:39 -0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] - auditing cmdline | From | William Roberts <> |
| |
Sigh...I sent this back out from another emai address and got bounced from the lists... resending. Sorry for the cruft.
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 7:34 AM, William Roberts <WRoberts@tresys.com> wrote: > I sent out 3 patches on 12/2/2013. I didn't get any response. I thought I added the right people based on get_maintainers script. > > Can anyone comment on these or point me in the right direction? > > RGB, Can you at least ACK the audit subsystem patch " audit: Audit proc cmdline value"? > > Thank you, > Bill > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org [mailto:owner-linux-mm@kvack.org] On Behalf Of William Roberts > Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 1:11 PM > To: linux-audit@redhat.com; linux-mm@kvack.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; rgb@redhat.com; viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk > Cc: sds@tycho.nsa.gov > Subject: [PATCH] - auditing cmdline > > This patch series relates to work started on the audit mailing list. > It eventually involved touching other modules, so I am trying to pull in those owners as well. In a nutshell I add new utility functions for accessing a processes cmdline value as displayed in proc/<self>/cmdline, and then refactor procfs to use the utility functions, and then add the ability to the audit subsystem to record this value. > > Thanks for any feedback and help. > > [PATCH 1/3] mm: Create utility functions for accessing a tasks > [PATCH 2/3] proc: Update get proc_pid_cmdline() to use mm.h helpers > [PATCH 3/3] audit: Audit proc cmdline value > > -- > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . > Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
-- Respectfully,
William C Roberts
| |