lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Dec]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: try to resume policies which failed on last resume
From
On 26 December 2013 06:35, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Subject: cpufreq: Clean up after a failing light-weight initialization
>
> If cpufreq_policy_restore() returns NULL during system resume,
> __cpufreq_add_dev() should just fall back to the full initialization
> instead of returning an error, because that may actually make things
> work. Moreover, it should not leave stale fallback data behind after
> it has failed to restore a previously existing policy.
>
> This change is based on Viresh Kumar's work.
>
> Reported-by: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@mork.no>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-12-26 04:01    [W:0.108 / U:0.444 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site