Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 26 Dec 2013 08:17:48 +0530 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: try to resume policies which failed on last resume | From | Viresh Kumar <> |
| |
On 26 December 2013 06:35, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > Subject: cpufreq: Clean up after a failing light-weight initialization > > If cpufreq_policy_restore() returns NULL during system resume, > __cpufreq_add_dev() should just fall back to the full initialization > instead of returning an error, because that may actually make things > work. Moreover, it should not leave stale fallback data behind after > it has failed to restore a previously existing policy. > > This change is based on Viresh Kumar's work. > > Reported-by: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@mork.no> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > ---
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |