[lkml]   [2013]   [Dec]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRichard Stallman: Why “GNU’S Not Linux” and Wh y We Should “Say LiGNUx”
    Dear fellow Linux kernel hackers:

    It has come to my attention that Richard M. Stallman, founder of the
    Free Software Foundation and creator of the GNU project, has once
    again set out to fragment our grassroots community.

    Recently, Mr. Stallman has started a new push for acknowledgement of
    GNU in Linux. No, not the familiar “GNU/Linux” that we're all sick and
    tired of hearing about but, instead, a failed anagram of these same
    terms. The campaign is called “Say LiGNUx” and demands that users of
    any Linux-kernel operating system employing GNU software (which
    comprises less than 15% of most modern Linux distributions nowadays)
    call the operating system “LiGNUx.”

    His presentation on the “Say LiGNUx” campaign is served in PNG format
    at so you can see the insanity for yourself.

    Yes, that's right. LiGNUx, pronounced like “pig cooks,” would be the
    name of choice for our work in the last two decades. Stallman suggests
    that we trash our existing name recognition and all common sense to
    adopt his academic linguistic exercise in masturbatory politics that
    represents the kernel's license and some poorly-built utilities that
    no one uses anymore.

    Mr. Stallman even suggests that users who refuse to say LiGNUx should
    instead install GNU/HURD so as to remove any ambiguity about licenses
    and nomenclature. What the hell?!

    When is the last time someone named their operating system after the
    license the kernel is released under? Such an esoteric naming method
    is madness. Should Apple call OS X “Apple/XNU?” Or how about the
    Berkeley operating systems? Should they call their products “FreeBSD”
    or “OpenBSD?” Should Microsoft call their operating system “Microsoft
    Windows?” The suggestion is patently absurd.

    We should not give in to the wailing demands of this zealotry. Mr.
    Stallman clearly needs a break from promoting an increasingly
    irrelevant software platform. Perhaps that means banning him from
    LKML, or asking Linus to suggest some vacation therapy for poor Mr.
    Stallman and his zealotry, or having the Linux Foundation issue a
    press release distancing themselves from RMS, GNU, and the Free
    Software Foundation.

    Whatever the next course of action is, we should all ignore Mr.
    Stallman and continue to call Linux as Linux.

    I am interested to hear your thoughts on the topic, fellow Linux kernel hackers.

    Merry Christmas.

    Liam Oskar Lindholm,
    Linux Kernel Hacker
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2013-12-23 18:41    [W:0.023 / U:3.836 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site