Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 23 Dec 2013 22:14:07 +0800 | From | Ding Tianhong <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 19/21] wireless: slight optimization of addr compare |
| |
于 2013/12/23 21:47, Felix Fietkau 写道: > On 2013-12-23 06:11, Ding Tianhong wrote: >> Use the recently added and possibly more efficient >> ether_addr_equal_unaligned to instead of memcmp. > It looks to me like all of these (including the ones in the other > similar patches) are in places, where the address data is aligned to at > least 16 bit. Because of this, using ether_addr_equal instead of > ether_addr_equal_unaligned would be much better for platforms without > CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS. > > - Felix
Yes, the most of the place should use ether_addr_equal. thanks.
Regards Ding
> -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |